Matters To Question!
Personal Beliefs, Choices & Actions Questioning
Racism
Why this question at this time?
Why address an issue so loaded with negative history, complex emotional
scars, and often unacknowledged, unexamined personal and institutional
complicities?
Why disturb this sleeping elephant in the historical closet?
There is a simple initial answer!
A tornado of controversy focused on Senator Barack Obama (the first
black American to have a realistic chance of becoming President of
the US) generated by the remarks / sermons / beliefs of his former
UCC pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright, Jr.-- remarks / sermons /
beliefs that some observers say clearly reflect -- and support –
reverse racist attitudes and positions.
Rev. Wright has forced -- or I prefer to say -- allowed Senator
Barack Obama to bring the elephant of racism out of its historical
closet of avoidance and neglect -- and place it as a topic for serious
examination, discussion and debate on a national stage. Maybe
not the most politically correct thing to do as a black man running
for president -- but the necessary and right thing to do.
And – trying to be “fair and balanced” as one “unfair
and unbalanced national network” urges us to be -- Senator Obama's
relationship with Rev. Wright is an appropriate and fair target for
questions – since those to whom a future president might turn
for guidance or advise need to be examined.
But beyond the specific relationship with Rev. Wright, this controversy
is important because it provides a platform from which to launch a
larger national discussion about the ongoing legacies and impact of
racism in America today – a discussion that largely disappeared
on the national stage with the deaths of Martin Luther King and Bobby
Kennedy in the late sixties – a discussion that some pundits
view as outdated or unneeded because of a half-century of national
changes in American attitudes and actions on race -- backed by many
federal laws preventing overt segregation and supposedly protecting
basic rights for everyone.
Yes – the racial configuration of American society generally
has changed in major ways for the better since the sixties. But it
is still impossible to deny that our country has significant unfinished
business in allowing every American -- especially those of color
and certain ethnic identities and social classes -- true equality
in gaining access to the Dream of One America.
It doesn't take 20/20 vision or a crystal ball to see that some significant
divides / separations still remain between the races / classes / ethnic
groups in 21st Century America.
So I welcome a 21st Century examination of what race really means
in America today! I'm more than ready to hear people talk about
-- not avoid -- issues of race, class and ethnic identification --
even if the debate occasionally turns somewhat ugly and negative.
There is much more to gain than lose by engaging in this discussion.
Politically, I'm not sure what the outcome will be and how it ultimately
will impact the presidential campaigns of Senator Obama and his opponents.
But the issue of race -- and whether it matters today -- was sure
to emerge as a topic at some point in the presidential campaign. Better
now than later.
Back to Rev. Wright -- bless his retired evangelical soul! How did
he spawn such a whirlwind of controversy?
Well -- as many in America are discovering (thanks to YouTube
and other tools of modern communication), Rev. Wright -- longtime
pastor of one of Chicago's largest and most influential UCC churches
(with a middle to upper class membership by most standards) -- has
a dubious and rather extensive history of making public statements
that some observers (including Senator Obama) describe as potentially
racist, questionably unpatriotic, overly general and negatively stereotypical,
too often demeaning – and sometimes relentless in verbal attacks
on those with whom he differs or disagrees.
One does not have to Google long to find plenty of Rev. Wright's
use of language that reflects a view of America almost irreconcilably
divided by issues of color and race. Language that seems to reflect
considerable intolerance with and mistrust of “the others”
who control America (usually meaning white Americans.) Language that
-- when used by black activists -- is often described and interpreted
by white Americans as the vehicle for supporting reverse racism. Certainly
words -- when read or heard by those outside of Rev. Wright's flock
of followers, parishioners and admirers -- that appear designed to
inflame passions, resentment, division and anger more than to support
the positive themes of hope, progressive change and social reconciliation
– themes voiced so eloquently in the speeches of Senator Obama.
That's the way it seems. But -- as is the case with most complex matters
and relationships -- that may not be the way it actually is. And it
is possible that the outcomes and actions that have resulted from
the words of Rev. Wright may be far less onerous and destructive than
the words seem to imply.
This is not an excuse for -- or defense of -- blatantly offensive,
racist, stereotypical or abusive language. It is a caution to avoid
the hasty rush – as many pundits seem inclined to do -- to reach
easy conclusions and make convenient (but naive) associations and
connections that may not be justified by deeper investigation.
The internet avalanche of harsh and quick judgments hurled at both
Rev. Wright and Senator Obama by pundits -- and the public at large
-- should give those seeking some objectivity on this matter cause
to pause -- breath deeply -- and resurvey the complexity of the landscape
-- before reaching conclusions or assigning additional blame.
Because of the long and very close relationship between Senator Obama
and Rev. Wright -- a relationship that is rich and varied -- a relationship
that Senator Obama has never denied and has not totally rejected --
a relationship that produced the trademark phrase of much of Senator
Obama's current campaign for the presidency, THE AUDACITY OF HOPE
-- questions emerge regarding how Senator Obama feels about Rev. Wright's
views and (most importantly) does he embrace or repudiate them?
To be fair to Rev. Wright -- he is a very complex individual -- a
product of a generation of black Americans who fought -- courageously
and relentlessly with great sacrifice -- against a powerful and often
vicious system of discrimination to end the overt segregation that
defined much of America's racial landscape in the early and mid-20th
century. Rev. Wright -- and most of his generation of black Americans
-- suffered through experiences of personal indignity, insult and
discrimination most white Americans only read about in history books.
Not a reality they experienced or with which they can associate personally.
Again, not an excuse for Rev. Wright's well-documented cases
of bad judgment, inaccurate information and angry rhetoric -- but
a reminder to place the individual within the larger social context,
timeframe and experiences that shape his or her life and actions.
Promoting an aggressive social gospel expressed within a movement
that is known as Black Liberation Theology – Rev. Wright’s
view of the world took shape and expression. His dedication to the
total liberation of black Americans from the bondages of segregation
and discrimination was the driving focus of his life – his willingness
to sacrifice his own security and wellbeing unquestioned. Joining
the other giants of the civil rights movement, he helped bring an
end to many of the overt manifestations of the sin of American
racism. And while others in the civil rights movement moved on
to pursue more moderate, pragmatic, politically-correct approaches
to social change -- leaving behind some of the harsher rhetoric and
condemnations of the past -- Rev. Wright retained much of his earlier
“edge” – often demonizing certain groups or people
he distrusted or feared – as a way to remind his parishioners
that it is both naïve and dangerous to believe the struggle against
racial oppression and inequality is over – that new oppressors
are still oppressing the poor and helpless – and the community
of the oppressed must remain united.
To those who want to transfer by association Rev. Wright’s
views and beliefs on race, patriotism, animosity and distrust of certain
people or groups directly onto the shoulders of Senator Obama –
my advise is – don’t waste your time going there.
While Rev. Wright might have a few dedicated followers who share his
political views, there is NO EVIDENCE that Senator Barack
Obama is a member of such groups.
Rev. Wright – if anything – expresses outwardly and adamantly
the residual, subliminal anger and frustration that is certainly part
of the legacy of many oppressed people – in America and around
the world. And those who would deny that black Americans were not
“a tragically oppressed people – many of whom still experience
the side-effects of centuries of that oppression” are historically
disconnected from the reality of American history and the modern lives
of many black Americans. From my perspective – it is simply
amazing that such a legacy of overt oppression has not produced more
angry disciples for Rev. Wright – more descendents of segregation
and slavery whose forgiveness for such oppression is less than
forgiving.
Once again, there is no viable evidence to support accusations that
Senator Obama is racist, unpatriotic, historically naïve or radically
ideological. To the contrary, his record of non-discrimination on
racial, ethnic and cultural matters is exemplary -- clearly documented
in any number of books, speeches, interviews and essays. His life
experience has lead him to focus on reconciliation and unity grounded
in core American and broadly human values – and his words are
supported by a record of actions embedded in a career of public service
to Americans of all races and classes.
Senator Obama's America includes all Americans – Americans of
all colors, creeds, cultures, doctrines, classes. He is the living
example of someone produced through a biracial union – raised
and taught in a dynamic multicultural environment -- a person better
able than any living American leader with whom I am familiar to succeed
in helping his fellow Americans weave together the many human threads
that make our national experience so richly diverse and dynamic –
and envied by much of the world.
Yes – in an ideal world -- it probably would have been “politically
better” for Senator Obama to dissociate himself sooner and more
completely from the incendiary views of Rev. Wright. But given that
most of his relationship with Rev. Wright was not political -- but
deeply spiritual, personal and grounded in events as significant as
his conversion to Christianity, his marriage, the baptism of his daughters,
the extensive social ministry of his church in his community –
it is – to me – understandable and even admirable that
he clearly distanced himself from Rev. Wright’s political views,
while at the same time, he retained his personal, spiritual and family
friendship with Rev. Wright – a personal relationship that a
lifetime of significant non-political encounters produced.
For me, there is no long-term issue of guilt by association with
Rev. Wright. Unlike some leaders who actually hold – or
have held – the office of the presidency – Obama seems
more than willing to admit his personal failures, mistakes, and less
than perfect judgment on all matters and relationships -- and move
forward – a very refreshing difference from leaders who seem
adept at finding ways to sidestep the truth – or arrogantly
continue to follow deeply flawed advise and policies. Obama is human
like the rest of us – but special in that he seems to acknowledge
and learn from his mistakes and failures.
Hopefully, the public’s long term assessment of the Rev. Wright
issue will be that Senator Obama accurately addressed his relationship
to Rev. Wright – admitted personal disappointment with aspects
of that relationship – and demonstrated thoughtful leadership
in using the controversy to focus a national conversation on the unspoken
reality of the many ways race – the elephant in America’s
historical closet -- still divides and separates Americans from each
other – whether we admit it or not.
Separation by race, ethnicity, class and culture in so many areas
of American life IS REAL – not imaginary. So many neighborhoods,
social clubs, religious gatherings, workplaces – especially
public schools – are places of separation – not integration.
Exclusion – not inclusion. And – as stated by both Martin
Luther King in the 60s and Barack Obama today – the “church
hour” on Sunday (when our deepest values are supposedly most
on display) remains one of the most segregated weekly hours in American
social life. The lesson is clear that it is much harder to undo racism
of the mind, heart, soul and voluntary social association than racism
of the law.
In too many ways, America remains – more than half a century
after the end of legal segregation – a society that is still
dramatically separated socially, economically – institutionally
-- by something as superficial as skin color. And in our separation
– we continue not to make the human connections with that could
allow us to understand, appreciate – have real compassion for
each other – regardless of race, ethnicity, culture or class.
And for Senator Barack Obama – whose primary political message
is about positive change and expanded hope – a vision of an
America that is “one out of many not many afraid to be one”
– the issues of de-facto, de-cardio racial separation,
mistrust and misunderstanding need to be faced, discussed and positively
embraced as a national strength – not a glaring national weakness.
So I end this essay by thanking Senator Obama for asking us –
as fellow Americans -- to address positively, frankly and openly some
troubling, semi-hidden racial, ethnic, cultural and class realities.
To talk with – not just about – each other. To gather
closer together in dialogue – not wander further apart in isolation.
To move the discussion of these matters far beyond Rev. Wright –
discovering what we can do individually and collectively as a nation
to connect together in support of The One America Senator
Barack Obama challenges us to embrace.
Back To Top
Links to further develop QUESTIONING
RACISM: Most info below from March 19, 2008 -- day after Obama Race
Speech -- and subsequent commentary and analysis. YouTube Reports
Obama Speech on Race reached "Most Viewed Status" in 24
hour period after given on March 18. Over 4 million hits
on Obama's YouTube Channel and growing. Seems to indicate
some interest in this topic!